I'm no Mansfield fan & I don't agree w/everything TWS has published. But 1) this line is somewhat out of context (refers to male capacity for rape, not individuals); 2) shall we recall the time TNR ran a piece arguing an artwork should be destroyed b/c artist is the wrong race?https://twitter.com/HeerJeet/status/1074424204697563136 …
-
-
For a while, I regretted being muted by Cathy earlier today just for pointing out that she cavorted with G*merg*te far longer than anyone sensible could ever do, but on second thought, I'm fine with her muting me. She's a hack.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's not that different from Camille Paglia, once a TNR regular. As I said, I'm not a fan of Mansfield, or of bio essentialism, but I think those views should be debated, not banned from the public square. As for the Dana Schutz piece, that's what it boiled down to, IMO.
-
You only seem to understand that some speech is meant for the dust bin when it comes to antisemitism: https://twitter.com/MarkHorowitz/status/1074747265976279040?s=20 …
This Tweet is unavailable.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Precisely. Even entertaining the idea of destroying a painting for ideological (and race-based) reasons is horrifying.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.