Let me guess: the Standard never had a sustainable business model, leaving it up a creek when the donor class decided to go all-in in Trumpism?
-
-
-
Basically, yes.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Could be both.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Wait, you mean conservative sponsors aren't supportive of the free flow of contrary opinions?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
if by disturbing, you mean normal and a fitting end to a stupid warmongering rag founded by bill kristol, then i agree
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The article is too long winded. Is there a summary? :D
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When you’re essentially a vanity project for billionaires it’s probably a bad idea to not kowtow to their preferred ideology. I give them credit for holding the line but it’s not like Gawker where they were targeted by outside money as per of a personal vendetta.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.