1. This is a tempting stance but a bit too glib. No magazine should be judged just by its worst moments. Aside from lots of neo-con boilerplate, The Weekly Standard has had some sterling writing. It's been more consistently anti-Trump than any other conservative publication. https://twitter.com/DavidKlion/status/1070099216326905856 …
-
-
The strand that believed the same things as Trump but couched them in more polite language? Good riddance imo
-
They hate Trump but love his policies. The man himself may be base and vile, but he dies everything they wished they could’ve done. That’s why he hasn’t been impeached already.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
that's it, right? But that was always a veneer.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That particular strand had a significant hand in its own death. They all rode the tiger of right-wing "populist" paranoia and racism and never imagined it would grow too wild for them to manage.
-
That's true.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They rode the tiger and now the tiger has stripped the veneer and revealed American Conservatism for what it has been since the late 1960's... a Revanchist party of Racists serving Plutocracy
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The entire left is convinced that Trump won bc conservatives were excited to vote for him, on a whole, they weren’t. But Dems hated voting for Hillary even more and didn’t show up.
-
Keep lying to yourself dude.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.