1. This is a tempting stance but a bit too glib. No magazine should be judged just by its worst moments. Aside from lots of neo-con boilerplate, The Weekly Standard has had some sterling writing. It's been more consistently anti-Trump than any other conservative publication. https://twitter.com/DavidKlion/status/1070099216326905856 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
2. This is probably my favorite Weekly Standard article, Matt Labash's brilliant 2007 profile of Roger Stone. Timely!https://www.weeklystandard.com/matt-labash/roger-stone-political-animal-15381 …
9 replies 35 retweets 134 likesShow this thread -
3. More recently, It think this
@aliceblloyd profile of Dinesh D'Souza really gets at his personal arc better than anything else I've read.https://www.weeklystandard.com/alice-b-lloyd/american-politics-has-caught-up-with-right-wing-populist-dinesh-dsouza …4 replies 10 retweets 101 likesShow this thread -
4. The thing with articles like Labash's Stone or Lloyd's D'Souza is that they are not just "good by the standards of conservative magazines." They are good, period. Could easily have appeared in The Atlantic or Harper's.
8 replies 8 retweets 99 likesShow this thread -
5. Also, The Weekly Standard had a really distinguished books page, one that was old-fashion in the best sense (long essays on serious books), graced by some fine writers (not all of whom are conservatives): Joseph Epstein, William Pritchard, Gertrude Himmelfarb
5 replies 2 retweets 74 likesShow this thread -
6. I've been arguing for the last 3 years that Never Trump conservatism is a dead end, because the actual GOP is becoming ever more Trumpized. The troubles The Weekly Standard faces vindicates this analysis but I take no pleasure in that.
12 replies 19 retweets 135 likesShow this thread -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.