One consequence of the NYT and WaPo being so good at getting certain types of scoops is that whenever a scoop appears in another publication, you wonder if NYT/WaPo saw it and rejected it.
-
-
The reports refereed to a document authored by Ecuadorian Intel.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Another possibility is that US sources have talked to Mueller and can’t leak for legal reasons
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Exactly
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Timing of Trump's "what about everyone I know who *didn't* collude with Russia?" tweet also suggests that this is real
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It would be surprising if MI-5 did not have a photographic record of everyone who has gone in and out of the Ecuadorian embassy since Assange has been there.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I trust MI-5 & every European intel agency has shared all they have on the Trump family with Mueller. Can't wait for Michael Cohen to confirm Steele dossier & reveal he really was in Prague meeting with Russians.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.