Go on ...
-
-
-
... because ...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Agree. "around March 2016" is not the phrase used when working from a source that has the goods.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is bad story to run if it isn't nailed down tight.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think skepticism for ANY reporting is required. Is there any reason at all to wonder what might be inaccurate to a degree that’s not typical...? I’d love some clarity.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well-placed sources say... "don't believe everything anonymous sources say."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It sounds gossipy
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Presumably Mueller’s further info on Manafort lies will or will not include this item within days. Seems unlikely the purported visit would be uninteresting to him
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don’t know. Solely on their normal not at all crazy reaction I’m inclined to believe it. Plus they’ve lied before re This Storypic.twitter.com/m2SpL4w45C
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.