No, Hegel did not. That’s apocryphal. See: http://adsbit.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?bibcode=1992JHA....23..208C&db_key=AST&page_ind=0&data_type=GIF&type=SCREEN_VIEW&classic=YES …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
But he’s right about this.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I’m not sure anyone that bases their ideas on human society on the lives of lobsters has any insights worth troubling oneself on
- Show replies
-
-
-
It's a bit -- a bit -- disingenuous to treat even a bad metaphor as literal.
-
I think it's a fair reading of Peterson that he doesn't see these comparisons as metaphors but as proofs of his central claim, that hierarchy is natural.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@thegunnshow_
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.