Would you have said the same about Whelan prior to his vile tweets?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is almost word-for-word the defense used by people supporting Kavanaugh. There are excellent reasons to doubt him and no reason for lay people who don't know him to take Marshall's and your statements with a very fine grain of salt.
-
I guarantee you there is no way Josh would have written that series of tweets had he not been provided with definitive, ironclad proof -- and not even from me, but from a colleague of his who he trusts.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Jeff isn't usually dishonest, but he does support his friends that are fundamentally dishonest, like the plagiarist in chief and others on the Federalist crew.
-
Jeet isn't usually dishonest, but he does support his friends...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This post tight here is why people hate political reporting. The amount of deference given to folks based on misguided "professional courtesy" verges on the absurd.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If this was being discussed freely behind the scenes and it’s “bad for the Dem’s” why would they be surprised and delete it after The thread is published?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wish I could follow WTF you all are talking about. Reminds me of inside chatter back in high school
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You can parse “discuss” and still get to communication.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How many times do I need to see this good faith ascribed to bad faith actors before the professional elite class finally gets a fucking clue.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.