And this (self-deceptive) moral innocence was genuinely held, I think, at least on Buckley's part. He told his sister that Carleton Putnam was “a racist,” who should never be published
-
Show this thread
-
Nevertheless, racial assumptions underpinned the National Review editorial board’s dedication to constitutionalism and realist analysis of racial issues.
1 reply 2 retweets 14 likesShow this thread -
Although increasingly unwilling to state so baldly, the editors and contributors considered the idea that people of African descent were, if not theologically and philosophically inferior, at least intellectually or culturally so.
1 reply 2 retweets 17 likesShow this thread -
The tropes are familiar. Conservatives raised questions about black intelligence, emphasized “delinquency” in black communities, and questioned black intelligence and contributions to “civilization.”
1 reply 3 retweets 18 likesShow this thread -
Heer mentions the Ernest van den Haag essay, part of it reads: “the cultural achievements of Negroes… compare unfavorably with those of Caucasians, Chinese, Near and Far Eastern groups, etc.” Of course, he demurred, this did not imply “moral inferiority.”
1 reply 1 retweet 13 likesShow this thread -
Buckley happily published Kilpatrick’s work and called him an invaluable expert as he wrote “the Negro” “is still carrying the hod. He is still digging the ditch. He is down at the gin mill shooting craps. He is lying limp in the middle of the sidewalk, yelling he is equal.”
2 replies 4 retweets 15 likesShow this thread -
Around the same time, Buckley told Jeffrey Hart, whom Heer mentions, that NR “have been extremely articulate, non-racist while not attempting a dogmatic racial egalitarianism either.” Buckley said this privately, and meant it
1 reply 4 retweets 19 likesShow this thread -
but believed his views were so normal and so natural that anything short of explicit bigotry was not racist. And this is the self-fashioned myth that conservatives hold onto to this day. /Fin.
5 replies 8 retweets 64 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @Joshua_A_Tait
Great thread. I learned a lot. One thing I'd say, though, is that NR's position on domestic civil rights can't be disentangled from foreign policy, it's fear that decolonization meant "Suicide of the West" & desire to shore up white supremacy in Africa & elsewhere.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
Yeah, my work is rather domestic focused and I have to keep remembering to connect it all to the Cold War.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.