1. This @RuleandRuin article arguing that liberal historians have done a poor job of covering conservatism is getting a lot of attention but I think very weak.https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/09/09/liberals-dont-know-much-about-conservative-history-219742 …
-
-
7. When I first got interested in history of American right back in (God help us) the 1980s, almost all the books on the subject were by conservatives: George Nash, Jeffrey Hart, Buckley, Rusher etc.
Show this thread -
8. I supplanted my reading of these conservative histories of conservatism by reading back issues of National Review, American Spectator etc. And I quickly discovered that conservative histories were very unreliable because they all whitewashed the racism.
Show this thread -
9. For example, these books often treated Willmoore Kendall as a towering figure but completely ignored stuff like this.pic.twitter.com/MkPAeVl0b4
Show this thread -
10. A lot of conservative histories of conservatism weren't really histories at all but Tributes to The Wise Men of Olde Who Thought Right. Which meant, necessarily, ignoring tensions, contradictions, evolution. Not to mention social history.
Show this thread -
11. So I was really grateful when liberals and leftists like
@CoreyRobin,@rickperlstein@HC_Richardson@NancyMacLean5 etc. started writing on conservatism. Whatever disagreements I have with their work (and they disagree with each other) at least it's at least not a whitewash.Show this thread -
12. Here are my deeper reflections on why the history of conservatism is too important to be left to conservatives.https://newrepublic.com/article/151127/conservatives-know-much-conservative-history …
Show this thread -
13. I have something more to say about that
@RuleandRuin piece, although I realize I'm risking beating a dead horse. I think the larger political project of the piece is to recuperate a good, moderate GOP that no longer exists.Show this thread -
14. You see this a lot, not just among conservatives but also centrists & liberals (including Obama & Hillary Clinton): a positing of 2 GOPs: a good, moderate, intellectual GOP just interested in low taxes & military spending versus a bad racist Trumpian GOP
Show this thread -
15.
@RuleandRuin is of course the world's authority on moderate Republicans (his book is very good! Should be widely read!). But I wonder if he doesn't understate how powerful Trumpian currents were in GOP since at least the 1930s.Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I like how he blames liberals for the fact that conservatives don't take historical scholarship seriously.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.