Stop digging.
-
-
2. The fact Jeong got to Harvard despite university;s anti-Asian policy (which requires Asians to have higher marks to be accepted) is proof not of her privilege but her talent: that she succeeded in a system that is biased against her.
-
3. Jeong is doing well in journalism. Again, that's not mark of privilege but of success since journalism is a very white field which has been reluctant to diversify (arguably for economic reasons). https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/may/25/enduring-whiteness-of-american-journalism …
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Not denying that anti-Asian discrimination exists, but the Harvard admissions issue is a direct result of race-based affirmative action policies designed to help disadvantaged races. You can't point to it as an example of "white privilege" when it's designed to counter that.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
In my experience, you have to get into regular university before you go to law school, at least in most cases.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Haha, that's a point against you. The reason that Harvard is harder for Asians to get in is because of AA which is a LEFT WING PROGRAM. If we had stuck to color blind admissions then Asians would face no discrimination. But we're told that "color blindness is racism." Stop now.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.