1. Who wants to watch @sullydish egregiously & completely misrepresent another writer? It's an edifying experience.
-
-
3. But as
@studentactivism points out,@sarahjeong's tweet original belonged to a sequence, which sheds light on what the quoted tweet means.https://twitter.com/studentactivism/status/1025456758788120579 …
Show this thread -
4. In sequence, the tweets read: GOTTA HEAR BOTH Sides -- Andrew Sullivan Are white people genetically disposed to burn faster in the sun, thus logically being only fit to live underground like groveling goblins. let's hear both sides.
Show this thread -
5. In other words, if we read the tweets in context, its clear that Jeong was not (absurdly) arguing that white people are "genetically disposed to burn faster, etc." Rather, she was parodying the scientific racism of ... Andrew Sullivan.
Show this thread -
6. This is one example but it stands as a synecdoche for the larger controversy. Jeong made statements which are clearly jokes/satires/jibes & bad faith readers like Sullivan insist on reading them as racism.
Show this thread -
7. Now, here is a very clear-cut case of
@sullydish misrepresenting someone. Will he apologize? Will@NYMag issue a retraction & apology? LOL.Show this thread -
8. It's easy enough to criticize Andrew Sullivan. Let's take it step further and ask about New York magazine editor Adam Moss (is he on twitter?)
Show this thread -
9. Adam Moss made the decision that
@sullydish, someone who finds Asian names & accents to be inherently funny, was a good person to write about the Jeong controversy.https://twitter.com/sullydish/status/363407519755939840 …Show this thread -
10. Addendum. This lays out in an even clearer manner the fact that the tweet Sullivan objected to was one parodying Sullivan himself:https://twitter.com/awprokop/status/1025484876278112261 …
Show this thread -
11. Addendum II: This by my colleague
@onesarahjones is good:https://newrepublic.com/article/150404/dont-call-harassed-writer-neo-nazi …Show this thread -
12. Addendum:
@sullydish is avidly promoting a charming fellow who a) is offended at a joke making "rice cooking app for white people" b) repeatedly uses the phrase "white genocide" without irony. c) reads a joke about alt-right paranoia about "white genocide" literallypic.twitter.com/PsXrs0pePN
Show this thread -
13. The concept "white genocide" has a particular provenance. It's a signature concept of the alt-right.
@sullydish is helping mainstream this idea and Adam Moss is totally okay with that.Show this thread -
14. Here's the thing. If you are offended by "rice cooking app for white people" how do you deal with "White Men Can't Jump," Eddie Murphy's "White Like Me" or, in fact, 99% of hack stand up comedy? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L104LViQeIw …
Show this thread -
15. Hypothesis: leftists tend to slightly over-rate Evelyn Waugh & Anthony Powell out of a nostalgia for conservatives who understood irony & satire.
Show this thread -
16. Oh look, the Jeong critic that
@sullydish avidly promoted & repeatedly re-tweeted thinks we should keep an open mind about Pizzagate. Cool, cool.pic.twitter.com/D6ceFzG0de
Show this thread -
17. So, to recap: in his eagerness to discredit Sarah Jeong,
@sullydish promoted a guy who believes alt-right theory that "white genocide" is a real threat & is Pizzagate curious. And Adam Moss is okay with this & doesn't think it reflects poorly on New York magazine. Cool!!!!Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.