1. in terms of these "should they be fired for their tweets & bad opinions" controversies, the one I remain most conflicted about -- I mean genuinely torn -- is Quinn Norton.
-
Show this thread
-
2. Here Norton makes the case that she was the victim of context collapse. There's a smidgen of truth to that but it's more complicated. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2018/02/the-new-york-times-fired-my-doppelganger/554402/ …
2 replies 2 retweets 24 likesShow this thread -
3. With Norton, there are some genuine principles in conflict: a) she's talented b) she would've brought a much needed radical perspective to Times c) she has very crackpot/wrong-headed ideas about Nazis. That last point needs to be unpacked.
5 replies 2 retweets 38 likesShow this thread -
4. Her crackpot idea is that Nazis should be befriended by non-Nazis & also it's possible for Nazi to be otherwise a good person. Also it's okay to throw around racist & homophobic slurs as part of internet engaging with people on internet.
12 replies 2 retweets 30 likesShow this thread -
5. I think the most charitable possible view of Norton's thinking on Nazis is that it is super-naive. It comes from a place of extreme, radical innocence.
6 replies 2 retweets 54 likesShow this thread -
6. Being charitable, we can say that Norton thought it was possible to befriend Nazis & talk with them in their own language without being effected. Her assumption was she could pull them to her, not that they would drag her down. Which is naive & wrong but not vile.
10 replies 3 retweets 43 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @HeerJeet
Have you done much reading about the strategies employed by the people in Life After Hate?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Tweet #7 addresses that point
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.