Why not both
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
you dont think that between Flynn, Page, Misfud, Veselnitskaya, etc it’s also clearly a spy story at this point?
-
He won't engage this
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah like it has more to do with Murdoch than Putin
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You would be wrong
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yep. Legitimate leaders of republics and constitutional monarchies can't offer bribes or play dirty, the terrain DJT prefers.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The problem is that many liberals aren't particularly bothered by plutocratic corruption, so the spy story is their preferred narrative. Conversely, many on the left who usually complain about plutocratic corruption are insistent on treating this only as a spy story.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There is enough of both aspects (spy and corruption) to draft several unsaleable film treatments (unsalesable, because no one would believe the pitch).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The two come together into a “our government has a serious legitimacy problem” story.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The fsb is more of a plutocracy/mafia serving org than a traditional intelligence service
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.