overlooked facts to light. When the choice is no story at all, something by a biased party can still have value. Proof is in the details and so far at least core facts of Bran's account have not been challenged.
The best me too reporting has usually had multiple sources and also has tried to speak to all parties.
-
-
True, but this is a separate issue. You said you don't reply on reporting that relies on one side, as in stories that rely on cops etc.
#metoo
reporting has relied on one side, and still been good reporting. -
Some important
#metoo
pieces (about Aziz Ansari, Wieseltier, others) have been first-person narratives by survivors. Does not seem right to dismiss them for relying only on one source (namely, their own personal experience). - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.