This is also true. The point isn't the deny the entire validity of the Enlightenment (an impossible & foolish task) but to urge that it be seen as having a complex, conflicted, evolving legacy.https://twitter.com/OldDreyfusard/status/1003095762845093893 …
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
If I weren’t on vacation I would have written this up as a tweetstorm or column, but the most formidable Enlightenment legacy is the culture of critique from which flowed criticism of the Enlightenment from within itself (eg, Rousseau, Herder).
1 reply 2 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @DamonLinker
Agree. And to that extent critics of Enlightenment (including post-modern left & reactionary right) are working within its tradition more than those who make plaster saints of Locke & Kant.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
That’s my view, with some caveats. But more importantly, it’s close to Foucault’s view, too. (Interestingly, he gives Kant great credit for inaugurating this Aufklaerung ueber Aufklaerung.)
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @DamonLinker @HeerJeet
With respect, I think it's a bit of a red herring. Is anyone making plaster saints out of Kant and Locke? (FWIW, I agree Pinker's account of the Enlightenment is too simplistic.)
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Re: Plaster saints. Remember this all began with Bouie rightly criticizing David Brooks & Jonah Goldberg for claiming Locke as formative influence on ideas of "human equality" etc.(which is dubious unless it comes with a lot of provisos & hedging).pic.twitter.com/0zX2ktAHyF
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.