1. So this piece criticizes me for saying Jung has fascist sympathies. https://quillette.com/2018/06/01/tired-old-myths-new-republic-slanders-jung/ …pic.twitter.com/yONcbph5n0
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
There are rather bigger stakes in the Enlightenment debate though.
I have read a considerable amount of Jung (letters, seminars, books) and his comments on politics are minimal (beyond psychological commentary on the state of the society, and hence on individuals; or in somewhat superficial pieces like the interview "Diagnosing the Dictators.")
His most trenchant piece on politics, in the context of the psychology of mass movements, is his book The Undiscovered Self.
Unlike Hume, Kant & Locke, Jung never contradicted his Human Value thesis. Hume contradicted ‘constant conjunction’ Kant, the ‘Categorical Imperative’ & his epistemology, Locke his Rights & Equality thesis, all to advance bullshit racial superiority. Kant is the father of RACISM!
Your first mistake is reading quilette. Your second mistake is responding.
One of the problems with your article was that you made sweeping statements about Jung without even citing a single work written by Jung as evidence. Furthermore, for various issues such as Jung's supposed admiration of totalitarianism, you relied solely on one single book. 1/
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.