Yeah,, that was also a conceptual error in 1861. One side thought that the values of chivalry outweighed railroads and armaments.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
- Show replies
-
-
-
The 'twee cosmopolitan elite' already fielded antifa supersoldiers, right? Or was that bullshit too, then? :p
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So it's a long-standing stereotype and exactly wrong. Specialisation = more people in technical jobs = middle-class lifestyle = money and brains and experience in large-scale projects = winning wars. Plus now rich people are more likely to be in better shape and health.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
All of these people just assume that the US military's just going to vanish somehow and it's just going to come down to random right-wingers versus random left-wingers in the guns they already possess. Whichever "side" controls military at the time will win.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The North was better armed than the South though, and more populous. That isn't true of the Red/Blue divide.
-
Yes it is. By the way, I'm not sure I'd you know this but you can actually manufacture new guns. You dont have to fight a war with whatever weapons you have on hand when you start.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I just want to hear how Black and Brown people are somehow sitting out of the “Return of the Confederacy” when we for damn sure didn’t sit out of the first Civil War.
-
Say that louder for the folks in the back please sir.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
A civil war is a horrifying thought.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.