Idea: Give Trump his wall. No, no. Don't start screaming. Hear me out. Give him his wall, without caveat or condition. Give it to him. In return, Trump and Republicans must re-implement, ACTIVELY SUPPORT and FULLY FUND the ACA without caveat or condition. Yes? No?
Isn't this just a rehash of the old "would you sacrifice one child to save the rest of humanity? How about a thousand?" The only moral answer is no.
-
-
Boy I'm glad you solved a problem which has troubled moral philosophers for centuries so simply. Kudos.
-
I'll DM you my address so you can just mail me the Nobel, thanks!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yes. The wall is a boondoggle, but it's just a wall, and it will some day come down. The lives and households saved by ACA are irreplaceable, and, well, we are going to require robust immigration to meet health care sector job openings.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wait... It's "moral" to sacrifice many to save one?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.