This is how Chief Justice looked at Warren for a solid 5+ seconds after reading the question http://bit.ly/36BqJZX pic.twitter.com/62XXEhuHI1
U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više
This is how Chief Justice looked at Warren for a solid 5+ seconds after reading the question http://bit.ly/36BqJZX pic.twitter.com/62XXEhuHI1
Want to clarify quick after going back to watch the video a few more times: There's only one camera angle so it's hard to say exactly who Chief Justice is looking at. Based on where he looked when Sen. Warren called out, it appears he is looking in her general direction.
His answer?
It was Rep. Schiff who answered, saying he thinks no witnesses reflects adversely on the entire institution, not on Chief Justice John Roberts.pic.twitter.com/Wt7CXiiqVu
I have had the same question.
Some people are saying it was a bad stunt. I’m glad she did it.
How bad of a lawyer is Elizabeth Warren? Good grief. Also, this is the funniest thing I’ve seen in a long time.
Actually, this was a trial lawyer’s way of getting a that statement on the record. It’s good lawyering.
Here’s a question “Why are Senators running for nomination allowed to vote on a sitting president and opponent’s removal from office?”
For the same reason that crooked lawyers and Senators who may be involved in the Ukraine debacle are there.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.