“’If you are a liberal, by definition, you believe that it’s better to let a certain amount of guilty people go free than to jail one innocent man. That’s almost the definition of liberalism. These people on the left aren’t liberals at all, actually.’”https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/13/opinion/stephen-elliott-moira-donegan-media-men.html …
-
-
Every lad in the pub thinks they know what’ll make a utopia. “Everyone else is the problem and I know the solution!”
-
I actually disagree, I think it's definitely worse to jail an innocent man than let a guilty man go free because I'd rather err on the side of anarchy as opposed to tyranny.
-
Thats fine, I however think that we could improve the system to be more accurate, cutting down on both failures should be a priority instead of just adjusting it so that while we dont convict the innocent the law is not upheld, and i mean the important ones like murder
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Heather, IMO we should not take that position. In business, and some government fields there is a focus on process improvements. Inefficiencies and errors are to be rooted out. Poor outcomes shouldn’t be accepted. We can always be better. Your thoughts?
-
Finally someone understands what im sayin!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You can try to. And while I'm aware utopia is just some silly concept that's no excuse to try and make the judicial system more accurate and more fair
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.