Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
HeatherEHeying's profile
Heather E Heying
Heather E Heying
Heather E Heying
@HeatherEHeying

Tweets

Heather E Heying

@HeatherEHeying

Professor in exile. Biologist. Seeker and communicator of truths. Spends time in the Amazon. Rhymes with flying.

Portland, OR
heatherheying.com
Joined June 2017

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Heather E Heying‏ @HeatherEHeying Oct 9

      There is talk in liberal quarters of people—straight white men, mostly—working to preserve their unearned privilege. And it is true that being born into a phenotype that has historically held power constitutes unearned privilege. We all have some, some more than others. However:

      41 replies 61 retweets 272 likes
      Show this thread
    2. Heather E Heying‏ @HeatherEHeying Oct 9

      You know who else is preserving their unearned privilege? Grievance Studies scholars. #SokalSquared revealed the shoddy “scholarship” in these fields, and yet these departments and faculty are flourishing.https://areomagazine.com/2018/10/02/academic-grievance-studies-and-the-corruption-of-scholarship/ …

      8 replies 57 retweets 332 likes
      Show this thread
    3. Jim Mason‏ @JimBobgraholski Oct 9
      Replying to @HeatherEHeying

      They are basically the bad guys in "Atlas Shrugged".

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    4. ThisWeekInStupidPhD‏ @WeekInStupid Oct 11
      Replying to @JimBobgraholski @HeatherEHeying

      Jim and Heather, you guys should read the original papers and make up your own mind. Here's my analysis of just one. I include a link to all the papers. http://www.thisweekinstupid.com/2018/10/11/profs-perpetrate-hoax-just-not-the-one-you-think/ … #SokalSquared

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    5. Jim Mason‏ @JimBobgraholski Oct 11
      Replying to @WeekInStupid @HeatherEHeying

      Data presented was still malarkey though, they just claim to have learned a better method of what amounts to essentially psychologically unlocking the doors to being accepted without merit. That's bad.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    6. ThisWeekInStupidPhD‏ @WeekInStupid Oct 11
      Replying to @JimBobgraholski @HeatherEHeying

      They did succeed in getting falsified data accepted as ethnography. But their conclusions were largely removed from the paper since they were not supported by the data. It became exactly what it was--a single site participant ethnography.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    7. ThisWeekInStupidPhD‏ @WeekInStupid Oct 11
      Replying to @WeekInStupid @JimBobgraholski @HeatherEHeying

      But did you read how their jargon-y drivel was eviscerated by reviewers? Gorgeous.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    8. Heather E Heying‏ @HeatherEHeying Oct 11
      Replying to @WeekInStupid @JimBobgraholski

      You guys misunderstood my intention: I meant that the perpetrators of Grievance Studies themselves, the wokest academics, are preserving their unearned privilege. Not the authors of the hoax—far from it. My very brief take is included here:https://www.chronicle.com/article/What-the-Grievance/244753 …

      2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
    9. ThisWeekInStupidPhD‏ @WeekInStupid Oct 11
      Replying to @HeatherEHeying @JimBobgraholski

      Yeah. Got that. I think that reading the papers and reviews will change your mind. Very little of what's being said is true. Jargon can't mask faulty scholarship. Unsupported research which conforms to an agenda does not get a pass. All they did was falsify data.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      Heather E Heying‏ @HeatherEHeying Oct 11
      Replying to @WeekInStupid @JimBobgraholski

      I’ve read most of what they wrote, and the reviews. Was it Hypatia who lauded their work as exemplary scholarship? Back-engineering arguments to fit conclusions is anti-intellectual. Many fields do it; these fields both a) do it constantly and b) promote bigoted conclusions.

      2:03 PM - 11 Oct 2018
      • 2 Likes
      • Bud Silverstein Jim Mason
      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. ThisWeekInStupidPhD‏ @WeekInStupid Oct 11
          Replying to @HeatherEHeying @JimBobgraholski

          The review process fixed nearly everything wrong with the Hooters paper except the underlying deception. How does biology detect completely falsified data?

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. ThisWeekInStupidPhD‏ @WeekInStupid Oct 11
          Replying to @WeekInStupid @HeatherEHeying @JimBobgraholski

          In the end, all they could do was fool one editor of a quant journal with fake ethnography. Snore. Check out my analysis above.

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. End of conversation

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2018 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info