Kind of sad that so many people retweeted it without noticing that it was obviously wrong.
-
-
-
I don't think it's "wrong" in a general sense so much as noisy.
-
I get this. Possibly some increase in celibacy among young men recently. Seems reasonable.pic.twitter.com/victYxtRAj
-
Yeah, that was same as mine; I actually think it doesn't make sense to condition on marriage as Lyman did, but in any case he somehow lost a lot of data. I think there's a plateau for women and an increase for men.pic.twitter.com/vWr0pcer6d
-
I don't think he's wrong to look only at the never married group. That's the true incel population
-
Sure, but if there's is a general shift to non-marriage, and that reduces sex, then you're actually understating the change by conditioning. In any case, the never married/no sex women are either plateaued or increasingpic.twitter.com/kVsvH2vanM
-
If there are some women who are both avoiding marriage and avoiding premarital sex, then that makes sense. However, I would think the effects of Tinder would overwhelm that small group
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.