Right. The 1990 numbers may be close to accurate, and the overall trend is definitely more toward the current numbers. The recent dramatic shift may be real and due to Tinder?
-
-
-
Tweet unavailable
-
I don't really buy the mid-00s relaxation of the trend. Seems all wrong to me
-
Tweet unavailable
-
One man and one woman in each family like that...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Tinder etc. have vastly increased market transparency enabling especially women to optimize their behavior to command higher prices than before. Meanwhile more liquid & efficient markets means there's less friction & delay until women find a match, even if it's short in duration.
-
They like to call them selves "serially monogamous." But if that relationship is only a week or a month in duration, how is that much different from a sheikh who might not engage certain members of his harem for a week or month at a time?
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
-6% sounds correct to me
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Roasties gonna roast
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.