Eliminate all of the rapes in history, and none of us would ever have been born. Therefore, by the logic used by the Far Left, we would all have to be in favor of rape, in order to avoid the charge of hypocrisy. Reductio ad absurdum.
the curent immigration policy and one that prevents all immigration, I'll take the latter. The "let white people in" option is too distasteful to most people
-
-
Really? Strictly speaking, I'm not White and it's not distasteful to me. I'd say "go for it."
-
I mean, seriously - who could object without being a hypocrite? Mexico deports Central Americans with regularity, and we can see how Black Africans have been treating the descendants of White immigrants. Ethnic cleansing is a lot harsher than the rejection of an application.
-
There is zero chance of an explicitly race-based immigration policy being accepted by the courts or the people. *Maybe* a special exception could be made for white South Africans, after enough videos of the killings of white children come out.
-
"There is zero chance of an explicitly race-based immigration policy being accepted" At the moment, probably not. But keep on plugging away at the SJWs, and their support will crumble.
-
Also, one can probably made a solid case for cutting the rate of non-refugee immigration to below noticeable levels. If one looks at the labor participation rate, counting discouraged workers as being unemployed (as common sense would suggest that one should), ...
-
... the unemployment rate ends up a lot higher than some people have been claiming that it is. But something tells me that you already knew what a hoax the official unemployment rate was.
-
Of course. Just let wages rise and end the constant upward pressure on housing prices.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.