I mean, that’s kind of the reason I’m asking too. Your response has all of these assumptions in it - about which kinds of biases can affect development in this way, what directions those affectors have moved.. What is the actual signal you use to make those conclusions?
No, you think you're uncovering bigotry but in reality your criteria are just insufficient (eg differences in sentencing for the same crimes without considering the unique facts of each case (protip: black crime tends to involve more cruelty at every charging level))
-
-
No. When it is unstated, it is just bias. We measure bias. This is found in decades of research, across social process. Only by stating the criteria explicitly and measuring those can we determine which is due to bigotry. You seem to conflate these.
-
Again, you exclude other confounders and assume it's bigotry as a result (ie you're not measuring bigotry directly), but you aren't actually excluding all the relevant confounders
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.