Spencer replied and said he'd love to have a discussion. Someone replied "stay in your lane Spencer!", lol. Identity politics is kinda Spencer's lane.. Anyway, I doubt it'd go well for Peterson, conversion numbers wise, even if leftists felt he won the debate.
-
-
-
Peterson is way behind
@RichardBSpencer when it comes to thinking all of this through -
I think Pinker has thought about it the most, at least subconsciously. I think Haidt outright knows and just don't know how to talk to the left yet (if ever)
-
Pinker really does have a deeper understanding, imo, even though he doesn't really let on
-
https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/1a67x4/i_am_steve_pinker_a_cognitive_psychologist_at/c8ugdw9/ … I swear he answered a question like this on reddit years ago, he might've deleted it.. Anyway, I think you're right, it's just Haidt has given more obvious indication he's more blatantly aware. I suppose Pinker suggesting jewy behavior is genetic...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
He is also the dissident right's greatest recruiting tool. As soon as you adopt Peterson's value structure, a good one, you pretty quickly realise that conventional right-wing politics is totally inadequate to the task of defending those values.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@jordanbpeterson offers too much value for individual personal character developmental ignore his wise contributions because of his increasing political stridency. -
He’d certainly be more effective were he perhaps subtler or more indirect. Lead the audience to draw their own political conclusions rather than beating them over the head like with a 2 by 4.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.