They have essentially no evidence for this, of course. There's no evidence that Wikileaks is associated with Russia, and there's no evidence that the leaked documents came from anyone but inside sources. There's no evidence of election hacking.
-
-
Show this thread
-
The best they have is: Trump was hopeful that the missing Hillary emails were in the hands of Russian hackers. It turns out they weren't.
Show this thread -
That's literally all they have. Yes, the Trump team was open to receiving dirt on Hillary. There's no evidence that the Trump team took any inappropriate actions to get any dirt.
Show this thread -
Everything else is just meaningless post-election or process-related crap, eg Flynn meeting with Russians after the election and telling them that he'd see what they can do regarding sanctions.
Show this thread -
Having investigated for long enough, though, I'm sure Mueller will come up with something. He'll accuse Trump of obstruction of justice even though there's nothing underlying to obstruct.
Show this thread -
(and when I say "nothing underlying", I fully expect that they'll spin something actually innocent as nefarious collusion. Nothing underlying in reality, but Dems will scream about it)
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.