This goes well beyond the usual Bb model, and in fact is only relevant to a tiny percentage of blue eyed people. Who is ignoring the science, again?
-
-
Replying to @HbdNrx
You've just said it yourself. "It applies". So, try again.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TerriWinters17
99% of blue eyed couples will only have blue eyed kids. What's more likely: adultery or the very small odds of this unusual genetic situation?
1 reply 2 retweets 19 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx
No matter what the odds are, It still applies, it's still science. Science doesn't care what you choose to believe.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TerriWinters17
You literally don't believe in statistics. Go look at the statements. "you are most likely to be questioned". "middle school science" (literally not covered and a recent development regarding rare variations)
2 replies 0 retweets 19 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx
It was "YOU will most likely be questioned". Emphasis on the woman posting & insinuation that she is an adulterer. These things can happen more than once in a family. Statistics change with instance. Quit ignoring science because you want to be right.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TerriWinters17
I know this isn't clear to you, but "most likely" is a statistical statement. And he was in fact correct.
1 reply 1 retweet 17 likes -
-
I enjoy being correct
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.