Probably they should explicitly only have given immunity to service providers who didn't censor, but that would literally be the opposite of the original intent, which was to encourage censorship by preventing suits based on the idea of censorship as editorial control
I suspect that Congress would have been perfectly happy to allow sites to censor "objectionable" political views, tbh. People who actually care about free speech are a minority in this country
-
-
Oh I remember those days. Censorship was popular then, too, especially with congressional types. AOL's censorship was quite extensive. It actually wasn't until the mid-00s that people started to get used to the idea of real freedom of speech online.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Except when it comes to "protecting the children", in which case people signal like mad in such polling
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.