Nature vs nurture is irrelevant.
-
-
-
They're not separate from each other and interact. It's like you have to choose one or the other. 'Nah it's 80/20.' 'No it's 50/50' 'No its 0/100'. It's false dichotomy This book is a foundation text for DST https://cissct.duke.edu/books/ontogeny-information-developmental-systems-and-evolution … Paper by the authorhttp://www.academia.edu/791831/The_nurturing_of_natures …
-
There's a big difference between 80/20 and 20/80, and people legitimately argue over how much of one or the other
-
And it's pointless to argue over it.
-
No it's not
-
Nurture is development. Nature is nothing without the organism's surroundings.
-
Yes, but most of the debate begins with a baseline of environmental conditions eg nutrition levels shared by most people
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Marxism/Liberalism as a political ideology assumes/requires a belief in environmental determinism/ infinite malleability--- that's why any assertion of innate differences is met with hysterical outrage, epithet-hurling and suppression/arrest, e.g., the modern university
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.