And if you object to the concept of "smarter" or of intelligence generally, I think you should know better
I am familiar enough with test results to know that they're generally pretty accurate
-
-
Doesn't answer my question.
-
Doesn't say anything to my explanation. Do you care about how rulers are created?
-
As far as I can tell, you're claiming some combination of: 1. Intelligence isn't real or 2. Intelligence can't be measured or 3. Tests are poor at measuring intelligence All of these are false
-
My claims 1) IQ tests don't test 'intelligence' 2) it can't be measured with what we have now due to the problems I discussed 3) they're poor because of how they're constructed 4) you can make other groups score higher by item selection
-
5) IQ tests form the normal curve due to how they're constructed with item selection 6) heritability of IQ increases due to, again, how the tests are constructed 7) therefore IQ tests are garbage and don't test 'intelligence'
-
If you own any statistics textbooks you can see that they verify my claim on IQ and construction.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.