But there are 'IQ correlates', which don't prove causation. 100 tears of 'IQ science' and it's still based off correlations. Nothing definitive. Nothing causative. There's real science (microbiome) then there's 'IQ science'.
-
-
So it doesn't matter how IQ tests are created? Item selection doesn't matter?
-
If the tests are accurately telling me who is smarter, which they are usually pretty good at, then I really don't care.
-
I explained the reasons why they're 'good at that'. You can create other assumptions just by item selection. Read into test construction. You're wrong.
-
I am familiar enough with test results to know that they're generally pretty accurate
-
Doesn't answer my question.
-
Doesn't say anything to my explanation. Do you care about how rulers are created?
-
As far as I can tell, you're claiming some combination of: 1. Intelligence isn't real or 2. Intelligence can't be measured or 3. Tests are poor at measuring intelligence All of these are false
-
My claims 1) IQ tests don't test 'intelligence' 2) it can't be measured with what we have now due to the problems I discussed 3) they're poor because of how they're constructed 4) you can make other groups score higher by item selection
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.