The map is correct but as usual with these discussions it must be understood that the parties themselves will change in order to approach 50/50 https://twitter.com/NickJFuentes/status/926289861765722112 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @HbdNrx
I still believed this in early 2015. I also believes all other candidates would steal Trump's platform...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @QuasLacrimas
Oh the parties reorient all the time. Most likely reorientation on this map: whites end up going in substantially higher percentage for Republicans
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx
If you look at democracy globally, 50-50 party systems are rare. Most multiracial democracies have parties mimicking demographic makeup
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @QuasLacrimas
This is just a basic result of the electoral system. I agree that the divisions will fall dominantly on racial lines, but there's always room for reorientation, eg the nonwhite party splits off the cucks, or Asians go for the white party, etc
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @QuasLacrimas
Sure, that in a first past the post winner take all voting system there will tend to form two parties that over time tend to average around 50% each See https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duverger%27s_law …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx
the evidence for Duverger's "law" is not very good, unfortunately. Even by the modest standards of poli sci
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I know this is supposedly "political science", but it's more of a natural result of the statistics of coalitions splitting and regrouping https://authors.library.caltech.edu/81155/
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.