People who don't think optics can be controlled are not interested in winning.https://twitter.com/HbdNrx/status/924008525839216640 …
You can control how you look and act, and you can pick your friends. However, it's neither desirable nor possible to control how everyone who's going to end up being associated with you looks and acts.
-
-
If you cannot control your public image, you've certainly no claim to sovereignty.
-
Nobody is claiming to have sovereignty
-
Well... then we're doomed.
-
It's not something you can simply claim like that. The federal, state, and local governments retain that for now
-
A *real* political party is a gov't in exile. At min, it has sovereignty over itself.
-
If we had sovereignty, we'd keep antifa away, too. We're talking about a guerilla movement that's a loose collection of people, which has the advantage of not being easy for the government to suppress
-
Antifa is not MY problem... But they'd be quite easy to control if there was but the will to do it.
-
Very hard when the government is pro-antifa
- 14 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
That said, the AmRen conferences of the past seemed successful enough optics-wise with coat and tie required.
-
Also I like the term opticscucks
-
Yeah but you'd call me one... because I wouldn't be caught dead standing next to such people at the emperor's coronation.
-
Look what MM said: You treat these ppl like NYT mucks treat the antifa. Good-hearted, but unacceptably de classe.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.