3. Wealth is strongly affected by fertility rates. Groups who divide their wealth among more children will tend to have less per person. Whites have had lower fertility than blacks and hispanics for a long time.
-
Show this thread
-
If we're asking, "Is this wealth gap caused by discrimination?", the answer is no.
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likesShow this thread -
You could say, "even so, we should redistribute to make things more even". I would point out that this penalizes savers and low fertility groups. I would also say that those $116k median whites you apparently want to take from aren't exactly rich.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likesShow this thread -
If you respond, "oh, I just mean we should take some from the billionaires and give it to everyone," then I might agree with you. Keep in mind that communism has a very bad record.
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
Since the threading might make #4 hard to find, here it is again: 4. Immigration will tend to increase the wealth gap because: A. Immigrants don't bring much wealth with them B. Immigrants are mostly nonwhite (cont)
1 reply 2 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
C. Immigration increases labor competition, lowering wages, making it harder to gain wealth D. Increases existing asset prices
2 replies 2 retweets 6 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @HbdNrx
High-skilled immigration given a suitable compensation floor and non-replacement provisions can improve GDP per capita and generate wealth.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
US already has masses of underutilized labor capable of taking up those high-skill professions. More immigration unnecessary.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Our unemployment rate among engineers is under 2%.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
We clearly do not have much "underutilized labor" in this area at least.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I've observed that there is
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.