"None of that transparency matters to Facebook." Facebook's actions here are, in fact, reprehensible.https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/08/opinion/facebook-wins-democracy-loses.html …
-
Show this thread
-
Secret political ads are by definition an attack on democracy. Their disclosure is not optional. Shocking FB continues to insist otherwise.
23 replies 283 retweets 537 likesShow this thread -
As a technologist who wants to see platforms used to benefit society, I am furious at how Facebook is handling this assault.
6 replies 120 retweets 354 likesShow this thread -
The only thing being asked of them is the same transparency every other publisher of political ads provides. How can they possibly refuse?
7 replies 82 retweets 201 likesShow this thread -
We know their ad platform is too big to adequately police themselves, even as the law requires that they do. To then hide behind secrecy...
5 replies 39 retweets 111 likesShow this thread -
It's cowardly, shameful, and a real danger to society. How do their leaders not understand this? Are they not paying attention? Beyond me.
17 replies 42 retweets 142 likesShow this thread
Don't forget Facebook's constant censoring of conservative views.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.