@hbdchick Peter Frost responded to your accusations of plagiarism
http://evoandproud.blogspot.co.at/2017/09/notre-dame-de-compassionparis.html?m=1 …
-
-
-
Frost is wrong to support this particular conception of "responsible scholarship". There's nothing wrong with anonymous sources for certain
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
kinds of things. You may want to be more careful about checking the anonymous source's own data and sources, but otherwise they're fine
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Anonymous raw data: potentially questionable Anonymous analysis: check it just like any other analysis
1 reply 3 retweets 10 likes -
What he did, citing a blog in your paper is something else.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
He's calling it irresponsible scholarship to cite anonymous analysis like that. He's wrong
2 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
I don't think so. In the adult world, we disclose our identity if we wanna be something. Plus HBD chick is an ideologically charged name.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
there's no ideology in human biodiversity.
5 replies 1 retweet 18 likes
Believing in this "genetics" thing is basically the same as being a Nazi
-
-
I wouldn't say that, but there is bias/ideology everywhere you look in life, especially on both sides of this debate, can't deny that
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.