kinds of things. You may want to be more careful about checking the anonymous source's own data and sources, but otherwise they're fine
-
-
Anonymous raw data: potentially questionable Anonymous analysis: check it just like any other analysis
1 reply 3 retweets 10 likes -
What he did, citing a blog in your paper is something else.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
He's calling it irresponsible scholarship to cite anonymous analysis like that. He's wrong
2 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
I don't think so. In the adult world, we disclose our identity if we wanna be something. Plus HBD chick is an ideologically charged name.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
In the real adult world, we realize the value of anonymity for bypassing groupthink. But I agree that he didn't want to cite anything that
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @HbdNrx @CanWeChill44 and
would get his paper rejected for any kind of controversial associations
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Not just the ideology, such a citing a blog is just not serious.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
As I stated above, there's no good reason for this to be true for anonymous analysis.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
man, blogs and wikipedia are even inappropriate references in school and college assignments, so what would you expect?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Yes, so a lot of people are getting this issue wrong.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.