What was it?
-
-
-
I used to believe that we should all just try to cooperate; that we could agree that we should strive for rationality, individualism, and
-
some neutral meta-values. If we just talked things over, meritocracy would win. Then I realized that if others
-
won't agree and in fact are cooperating with themselves but not you, then you lose.
-
Basically going from "let's all be as race neutral as possible" to "they're not willing to be race-neutral. Now what?"
-
"Time for some game theory."
-
Exactly
-
That is, I already knew all the facts. The last missing piece was the game theory.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Was libertarian thru my teens, but towards end of HS realised it required high-trust ergo high-homogeneity. Took a while to reason thru tho.
-
Libertarianism would inevitably undo it. Euros not profitable enough as workers.
-
Oh, since then I've discovered other objections to libertarianism. Its instability is a strong one.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Wasn't exposed to alternative views until Assange rape accusations when after finding Mainstream News unsatisfactory I went looking.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.