Reminder: when other groups act collectively against you and you act individually, you lose. See https://egtheory.wordpress.com/2013/06/30/how-ethnocentrics-rule/ …
-
-
Replying to @HbdNrx
That experiment is a really bad analogy. That's not why people cooperate. Cooperation is based on tit-for-tat.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PoisonAero
People cooperate more with, say, their family. It's not all individual actors going tit-for-tat with everyone.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HbdNrx @PoisonAero
In the simulation there I think they pitted tit-for-tat vs. a group that recognized each other and cooperated vs. other strategies.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx @PoisonAero
The "recognize and cooperate" group unsurprisingly wins, at least until they become more vulnerable to smaller group defection
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx
So, they succeeded until they failed. So, not a stable strategy even in that experiment.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Oh they didn't model the splitting down the line as far as I can tell. Too complicated for this simulation.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.