attacking lawyers is attacking an effect, rather than a cause. if statutes were clearly worded, ambiguities would go away
Does a small tribe spend its time on this stuff? Of course not. They go to the tribal elder and a decision is made efficiently.
-
-
You might say that scale requires this sort of law, and that may be at least somewhat correct. But reducing scale is also conceivable
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
and you find yourself with the trade-off I mentioned. the uncertainty of his decision will discourage economic activity.
-
Oh it's pretty easy to ask him what he thinks about what would be allowed.
-
Our current system certainly doesn't reduce uncertainty. Far from it
-
If you haven't read Moldbug on formalism, I highly recommend it
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.