Since dysgenics is an objectively stupid thing to be promoting, it has to be impressively self-propelling (until it hits bottom).
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness
Note that even in the absence of immigration or differential fertility, we get dysgenics from new mutations as long as mortality is low enuf
2 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx @Outsideness
In other words, we need some selection in the form of differential fertility or mortality just to keep up
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
Replying to @HbdNrx @Outsideness
And don't forget (the bright side?) that childhood mortality has fallen from 20-50% down to just a small fraction in the last 150 years...
1:59 AM - 6 Jul 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.