1. No reasonable person can deny that evidence exists indicating that Seth Rich may have been the DNC leaker.
indicative are the Wikileaks and Assange statements, etc.), and some people might say that there's a 10% chance he was the leaker while
-
-
others may say there's over a 90% chance. That's fine, there's room for debate there. I think the odds are pretty high. But the
-
position of "this is just an insane conspiracy theory with no evidence whatsoever" is blatantly wrong and willfully ignorant.
-
2. Any unsolved murder of a possible/likely leaker should be regarded with extra suspicion. This is fairly obvious. Some people really don't
-
want those kinds of damaging documents to get out, and if they knew who was responsible they might take matters into their own hands.
-
3. Coincidences can happen, and sometimes even a leaker could just be a DC crime victim. This is possible, but it does not appear that the
-
assassination angle has been fully investigated.
-
One can only conclude people screaming about how this must be ended to protect the family are just politically motivated to protect the DNC.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.