There's definitely a population size/standard of living trade-off, and I'd prefer to keep standard of living high.
-
-
-
Even just comparing the US today to the US in the 80s, the population growth is noticeable, and it's not good. More crowding, less escape
-
Deep South. Quiet, less people, better food.
-
too hot and humid
-
Hmmm... Appalachia or Ozarks might do you alright. Theres always the Plains too.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I feel like 1 billion would be optimal, but 10 billion would be manageable if they were the right ones
-
Tweet unavailable
-
I know. I really think African/third worlder population growth is going to be a disaster like never before in hist
-
Tweet unavailable
-
agree 100%
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
even with solar-powered aquaculture/hydroponic farms, what's the point?
#PaulErlich -
I mean, what, seriously, is the point? To maximize potential agents of commerce to farm for money, labor, taxes?
-
generally it wouldn't be a planned outcome, of course. But I agree
-
I think that's maybe the best way to fight it, calling such ideations out as such; call a spade a spade.
-
of course, will it get through to them, or will anyone care?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.