I do not think Zimbabwe has much to do with my philosophy.
-
-
Replying to @puckthecat1
It does, actually. You promote equality of outcome and ignore biological differences. The result is anti-white policies and
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx
I do not think that I did promote equality of outcome, actually. I think I made some predictions about strict scrutiny.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @puckthecat1
I assume you also ignore the relationship between diversity and conflict. More diversity = more conflict.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HbdNrx
You assume so many things. Diversity exists. You do not have a mechanism to remove it. You want to arrange it differently, perhaps.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @puckthecat1
not increasing diversity in the first place would have been a good start!
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HbdNrx
"Increasing diversity." The world is a place, and all the people are in it. Diversity exists, trying to arrange it by lines on a ...
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @puckthecat1 @HbdNrx
... orders the conflict into nation-state total wars instead of political arguments on Twitter.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @puckthecat1
I see no reason to think nation state wars would increase with a decline in the diversity of individual nation states
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HbdNrx
"Globalization" -- reducing salience of borders -- was the direct policy choice to entwine states together&avoid nation-state wars.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
more likely wars are down due to nukes and US power
-
-
Replying to @HbdNrx
& US power is just another way to say globalization, as we've pushed Anglo-American trade networks and free movement into world
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.