Subjective excitement indicator,by year: 80: Reagan 84: Reagan 88: ? 92: Clinton 96: Clinton 00: Bush 04: Bush 08: Obama 12: Obama 16: Trump
-
-
Replying to @HbdNrx
The more exciting candidate each year was the one you'd expect to fill bigger stadiums with more passionate supporters.
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx
The more exciting candidate has a very good record, but note that 2000 was essentially a tie and the more boring Gore got more votes.
2 replies 2 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx
When was the last time the obviously more boring candidate had a clear win? 1916? idk
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @nunzioni
Ford wasn't exactly drawing crowds. I don't get the impression anyone was excited about opponents in 24 and 28 & 24 had a weird
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
three way race
11:09 PM - 6 Nov 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.