@HbdNrx How likely, do you think? My gut wants to give me surprisingly high #'s, probably because so many previous anons gave accurate info
-
-
been keeping info to use in case he got in trouble. The Hillary pay for play stuff seems pretty legit.Beyond that,hard to say
-
I think what's going on is when anon predicts "A, then B" and pr(A) is really low, pr(B|A) gets quite high, because A validates info
-
Here, I'm feeling like past predictions were hinting at something really horrific like this, and lending their credibility to this
-
But there is absolutely no reason to believe this, other than a coherent story and a hash. Anyone could post that claim.
-
I don't know if this is the same anon, but the report by the supposed FBI anon to focus on the Clinton Foundation looks legit
-
Yes, that was one of the ones I was thinking of. Sounds like a pretty accurate summary of state of FBI knowledge in spring
-
The Clinton Foundation and pay for play stuff looks pretty serious to me, and intentionally deleting emails after subpoena
-
pay for play is obvious by now, the only way for Clintons and their servitors to avoid jail is for Hillary to win
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.