That a single person could have enough capacity to be worth 10, 20, 1000 people who 'struggle to put food on the table' is anathema to some.
-
-
They don't have to be 1000x better. Just sufficiently better that people prefer them making decisions that affect 1000's.
-
the context here is basically CEO pay, right? We should question whether CEOs are in fact accurately valued--very hard to know
-
Yes, but Einstein wasn't a CEO (that I know of?) and may not have suited that role, so not a great comparison.
-
yes, and in fact the marginal contribution of Einstein vs. the next guy is much higher than one CEO vs. the next
-
bottom line imo: some people really do make uniquely valuable contributions, but overall CEOs are overvalued because
-
markets just aren't that good at valuing one CEO vs. the next guy. So the sentiment isn't so bad given that context
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
and it should go without saying that most CEOs are hardly Einstein
-
Not that Einstein is remembered for his $$$.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.