.@HbdNrx @JohnRiversToo Since you haven't explicitly identified any groups, I did. Statists must be opposed b/c of actions not colors.
-
-
Replying to @MuskieRA @JohnRiversToo
can you just try to answer the question directly?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx
.
@HbdNrx@JohnRiversToo Your question presupposes several premises I disagree with. (1 of 3)pic.twitter.com/yKebdq9suq
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MuskieRA
.
@HbdNrx@JohnRiversToo You're shifting purpose of morality from survival of individual to that of a “group,” how is this justified? (2 of 31 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MuskieRA
.
@HbdNrx@JohnRiversToo This attempt is just as mistaken as referring to people as “cells” of society – with the same implications. (3 of 3)1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MuskieRA @JohnRiversToo
You can focus on individuals all you want, but you're not going to be able to get everyone else to. In particular,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
nonwhites are very oriented around their racial interests, as we see in SJWs. They will keep lookin at it this way
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
no matter how much you say they're immoral to consider things on a group basis. You can try to force them to
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
become individualistic, but that's going to be unpleasant for everyone, and it probably won't work.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
So the question remains, do you persist in equality & individualism in the face of others advocating group interest
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
(which means you end up losing because cooperation has its advantages). Can you realistically crack down
-
-
on the clannish? Or is advocating your own competing group interests best?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.